Saturday, June 27, 2009

The Big “Life Insurance” Debacle!!!

My husband's unfortunate marriage to THE DEVIL ended with their bifurcation on 4/29/05, and almost immediately he removed it as the beneficiary of his life insurance policy and changed it to me.

I don’t know how long it took before THE DEVIL found out about this switch, but the "shit hit the fan" about a year later. Here's the fallout, in all its blazing glory! Enjoy!

THE DEVIL’s 7/19/06 email: “...it became crystal clear who was more important … it became aparent [sic] when you chose to take your own flesh and blood off your life insurance policy to make her [me] sole beneficiary”

My Husband's 7/31/06 response: “Let me get this straight: are you actually suggesting that you are my “flesh and blood”?! On the chance that you’re at all confused about our relationship, allow me to enlighten you: No, we’re not…nor have we ever been blood related…that’s not only illegal, it would be disgusting. Regardless, the children were never listed as beneficiaries on my life insurance policy: I removed you, not them, as you’re no longer a part of my family. MY LOVE and I have a firm plan in place to care for my children in the event of my untimely death…and beyond that it’s really none of your business. And keep in mind I’ve never asked you who your beneficiary is on your life insurance policy as it’s none of my business, is it?”

Apparently, THE DEVIL didn’t like his answer.

THE DEVIL’s 7/3/07 email (written to her attorney and cc'd to my husband, with this section directed to him): “TOKEN MALE YOU ARE THE MOST SPITEFUL SELFISH VINDICTIVE PERSON I HAVE EVER MET! ... JUST LIKE YOUR LIFE INSURANCE POLICY MY LOVE HAD YOU TAKE THE CHILDREN OFF OF! DON'T YOU WANT YOUR CHILDREN TAKEN CARE OF IF SOMETHING WERE TO HAPPEN TO YOU! MOST COURTS REQUIRE A LIFE INSURANCE POLICY BUT WE NEVER GOT THAT FAR!”

My husband's 7/3/07 response (copied to THE DEVIL’s attorney):

“’TOKEN MALE YOU ARE THE MOST SPITEFUL SELFISH VINDICTIVE PERSON I HAVE EVER MET! THESE ARE YOUR CHILDREN.’
How pathetic. What a childish attempt to provoke me. …

‘JUST LIKE YOUR LIFE INSURANCE POLICY MY LOVE HAD YOU TAKE THE CHILDREN OFF OF! DON'T YOU WANT YOUR CHILDREN TAKEN CARE OF IF SOMETHING WERE TO HAPPEN TO YOU!’
What complete and utter B/S. The children were never listed as beneficiaries on my life insurance policy: I removed you, not them. YOU ARE NO LONGER MY WIFE!

MY LOVE and I have a firm plan in place to care for my children in the event of my untimely death…and beyond that it’s really none of your business. And keep in mind that I’ve never asked you who your beneficiary is on your life insurance policy because it’s none of my business, is it?

So would I be correct in assuming that I am your sole beneficiary on your life insurance policy? And if I’m not, should I also jump to the conclusion that it is the intention of whoever is your beneficiary to keep all of the money they would receive for themselves and not provide for our children? Because that’s certainly your way of thinking. Maybe this will ease your mind: just because you would behave a certain way in this situation doesn’t mean everyone would behave just as badly as you.

Either way, our children will be well cared for with or without my life insurance as they’d receive a substantial amount in survivor’s benefits from Social Security each month until they turn 18, get married or graduate from high school, whichever comes first. That’s the law.

‘MOST COURTS REQUIRE A LIFE INSURANCE POLICY BUT WE NEVER GOT THAT FAR!'
This makes no sense. I have a life insurance policy…you’re just not the beneficiary. And no court would ever force someone to make their ex their beneficiary. That would be absurd! (Think of all the psychos who’d have their exes killed for their life insurance money!)”

THE DEVIL’s 7/5/07 email: “The problem is, you allow your spouse [funny...it couldn’t even bring itself to refer to me as his “wife”] who has HUGE ISSUES with me, to MICRO-MANAGE our divorce and decisions within. You cannot make decisions on your own, and the decisions you have made i.e. LIFE INSURANCE are a prime example of how you have allowed her influence to potentially harm your very own? I don't see how ANY parent could allow themselves to be convinced of this. In fact, if heard in court it would not have happened.”

My husband's 7/5/07 response: “Wait a minute…'micro-manage our divorce'? What divorce? We are divorced! We’ve been divorced since April 2005! ... It’s regrettable that, for whatever reason, you continue to feel threatened or intimidated by my wife, but that’s your problem, not ours. I am fully capable of making my own decisions. However, THE DEVIL, for the first time in my life I’m in a true partnership. My wife doesn’t dictate to me, and I don’t dictate to her. I know this is a difficult concept for you to digest, but, yes, these types of relationships truly do exist.”

We haven’t heard a peep out of that bitch concerning my husband's life insurance policy since its July 2007 rant. Maybe, after reading through their email exchanges, its attorney finally told it to shut the fuck up!

No comments:

Post a Comment